On Mon, Apr 02 2012, Jani Nikula <[email protected]> wrote:
> Batch tagging brings performance and atomicity by opening and closing the
> db only once. The hex encoding handles insane message ids and tags.
> Otherwise there should be no difference.

I can maybe see performance in terms of opening and closing the db only
once, but atomicity?  Not sure I see how that is improved.

And shouldn't we be able to improve the handling of command line
arguments so that we get the same encoding handling on the command line
as we would from stdin?

jamie.

Attachment: pgpbyul7fbQLg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
[email protected]
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to