On Thu, Apr 05 2012, Peter Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > +test_begin_subtest "Set string value" > +notmuch config set foo.bar baz > +test_expect_equal "$(notmuch config get foo.bar)" "baz" > + > +test_begin_subtest "Set list value" > +notmuch config set foo.list xxx "yyy yyy" "zzz zzz" > +test_expect_equal "$(notmuch config get foo.list)" "\ > +xxx > +yyy yyy > +zzz zzz"
I find it slightly strange to use non-existent fields here, but I also don't see that it hurts anything either. At least at the moment. Another option would be to use an existing field, and change it back when you're done. jamie.
pgpGwpJZe589Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
