On Fri, May 18 2012, Austin Clements <amdra...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> -            (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
>> +            (GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto.gpgctx, &err);
>
> This should be crypto->gpgctx.

Weird.  Good catch, Austin!  But I must admit I'm thoroughly confused.
I tested every stage of this series right before I sent, and sure enough
this patch compiles cleanly and all tests pass.  Can anyone explain why?
I don't understand.  I'll send a new version of this one patch now
anyway.

jamie.

Attachment: pgp7lJq11gtEJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to