On Fri, Aug 03 2012, Austin Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > Code LGTM, but maybe the comment should explain that this is a > workaround for a bug in Emacs, given that both sleep-for and sit-for > are supposed to process process output and run sentinels (which has > been stated in the Elisp reference at least as far back as Emacs 21). > In light of this (and our better understanding of sleep-for and > sit-for from IRC discussions), the commit message is also misleading.
Indeed... Tomi _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
