Mark Walters <[email protected]> writes: > I can think of several possible solutions (e.g., batch it in my new > stuff, put some batching in notmuch-tag, all notmuch tag to read a > query from stdin). But before any larger more intrusive change do > people like the general approach? Does anyone have a good way to get > round the command line size problem?
Jani posted some patches to do batch tagging from stdin. I guess the last full series posted was at id:[email protected] I believe Jani has slightly updated (or at least rebased) the patches in git. I reworked and re-posted some of the foundational parts of the series at id:[email protected] I want to have some of this infrastucture for a new style of backup/restore, and it's possible that batch tagging would also speed up nmbug. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
