On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Rainer M Krug <r.m.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just want to say that having notmuch communicate with Gmail is terrible >> idea, since this >> would mean duplicating of jobs that offlineimap and notmuch do. > > My sentiments, notmuch is doing realy good what it is doing, and adding gmail > / other server > communication is not the best idea. And I disagree. >> I could see some *other* tool, besides notmuch and offlineimap, which >> connects to Gmail to >> fetch the tags, but that would again duplicate a lot of the code from >> offlineimap. > > I also agree here - offlineimap already has a repository type Gmail, and if > gmails imap > extensions, particularly > https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions#access_to_gmail_labels_x-gm-labels > is used, it should be not to difficult to read the labels and to store them > in e.g. a sqlite > database for each message id. This could then be written back as well, and > only the [GMAIL] folder > would have to be synchronised, i.e. no duplication. Not everybody uses offlineimap. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
