There are some pick patches I would quite like to get in: (note all
patches below only touch contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el)

id:[email protected] 
bugfix to use archive tags rather than always "-inbox"

id:[email protected]
bugfix so that running pick or search from split pane closes the split

id:[email protected]
tweak so that message in message pane is not indented 


then there are some possibles:

id:[email protected]
means that if the focus gets into the message pane then quitting from it
closes the pane. This seems to work well and fixes a genuine issue but
there might be better ways to fix it.  (*)

id:[email protected]
2 patches to add some thread based operations to pick

<not posted yet>
some tweaks so that various extra commands are available: eg stashing
message ids, viewing attachments etc. This is not intrusive but since
most of the patches above tweak key bindings the contexts tend to
overlap. (*)


The patches marked * redefine a couple of functions in notmuch-show.el
so theoretically could cause breakage of vanilla notmuch functionality
(but only if pick is loaded). 


Best wishes

Mark



On Sat, 15 Dec 2012, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote:
> As a nascent tradition (see id:[email protected]), I'd like
> to have a feature freeze on December 25, and release notmuch 0.15 around
> January 1, 2013.
>
> As usual there are a few last minute requests
>
> - I'd like to get the two memory leak fixes in
>   id:[email protected]
>   id:[email protected]
>   
> - Austin requested the scheme versioning patches; I think he will send a
>   followup to id:[email protected] soon.
>
> Generally speaking anything that happens to get reviewed and polished
> before the feature freeze is fine
>
> - I know Damien has been working pretty hard on 
>   id:[email protected] and I
>   have the impression that it is either ready or very close.
>
> - It would be nice to get the batch tagging stuff in
>   (id:[email protected]) but it can
>   also wait for the next release if it isn't ready. 
>
> Anything else people want to push for (and presumably review)?
>
> d
>
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
[email protected]
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to