Jani Nikula <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, 02 Feb 2014, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: >> Mark Walters <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> This LGTM (untested) >> >> I did test it, at least completely removing bash completion works as >> expected. >> >> Unfortunately --with-bash-completion does not override this test because >> the order things are processed. Do you think this is a bug? I wondered >> if users that "know what they are doing" (TM) might want to force >> installation even though the pkg-config test fails. > > I thought it was a feature, not a bug, but I'm fine either way.
I can live with the current patch. As you pointed out on IRC, this is the usual way missing dependencies work. And I think we should avoid extra complications in the configure script when we can. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
