David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> writes: > David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> writes: > >> Originally I thought this was uneccesarily intrusive, but on a second >> look I see that there is only one symbol changed that doesn't start with >> _notmuch, so I guess for consistency it's fine.
Actually, they all start with _notmuch. The symbol _thread_add_matched_author is not changed. >> I'm thinking about a 0.18.1 point release for build and portability >> fixes; I do think this is a bit too much change for that (especially >> since it doesn't actually fix the symbol hiding test (or more precisely, >> your fix for OS/X breaks the linux test). I agree. > Also, I'd like a less confusing commit message. Do you understand the > situation enough to write one now? In particular it's just a convention > that private symbols should not start with "notmuch", and the actual > hiding happens elsewhere. > > d Yes, I now understand the hiding happens elsewhere. There is a note in devel/STYLE in the "libnotmuch conventions" section that discusses the use of underscores to denote private library functions; I will cite that as the reason for the patch instead. chuck
pgpfZkPzAC03k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
