Fraser Tweedale wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Tomi Ollila wrote: > > > On Sun, May 11 2014, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Xīcò wrote: > > > >> Since zlib is part of the base system, FreeBSD chose not to register it > > > >> in pkg-config through zlib.pc. As a fallback test, configure will build > > > >> and run a zlib version check and make sure the header and library > > > >> versions are compatible. > > > > > > > > We could try to generate our on zlib.pc, this way the configure script > > > > would be cleaner. > > > > > > But for that we'd need to figure out the version, and is there simpler > > > robust way to do that some other way ? > > > > I don't meant to change the code that is checking for the version in the > > patch, you use the same code, but instead of have_zlib.c gen_zlib_pc.c, > > or something. > > > > [please cc me in replies; I am not subscribed to the list]
Unless the list does Reply-To munging, there's no need to say that. And this is a sane list, so no Reply-To munging :) http://felipec.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/avoid-reply-to-munging-mail-as-mail-was-meant-to-be/ -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
