On Mon, Jun 27 2016, David Bremner <[email protected]> wrote: > We could add many null pointer checks, but currently I don't see a use > case that justifies it. > --- > lib/notmuch.h | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/notmuch.h b/lib/notmuch.h > index d4a97cb..2faa146 100644 > --- a/lib/notmuch.h > +++ b/lib/notmuch.h > @@ -332,7 +332,9 @@ notmuch_database_status_string (const notmuch_database_t > *notmuch); > * functions on objects derived from this database may either behave > * as if the database had not been closed (e.g., if the required data > * has been cached) or may fail with a > - * NOTMUCH_STATUS_XAPIAN_EXCEPTION. > + * NOTMUCH_STATUS_XAPIAN_EXCEPTION. The only further operation > + * permitted on the database itself is to call > + * notmuch_database_destroy.
LGTM _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
