David Bremner <[email protected]> writes: > Do we want to have the same prefix listed in BOOLEAN_PREFIX_INTERNAL and > BOOLEAN_PREFIX_EXTERNAL? this seems quite fragile. If we don't though, > we have to use the same prefix name for queries as in the code (which is > already sprinkled with _find_prefix ("property") ).
Thinking about it a bit more, there's really no problem here. The invariant to maintain is the names are unique across all 3 tables used by _find_prefix, not the necessarily the prefixes. Indeed there's already the example of "is" and "tag". d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
