Tomi Ollila <[email protected]> writes: > > The probability for user error is pretty small there -- if there is > typo/thinko there things usually just starts failing. Security is > easier to break elsewhere than here (e.g. borken PATH...) > > I'd keep the current implementation of test_for_executable()... > > Tomi >
OK _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
