Mark Walters <markwalters1...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi > > Would it be worth putting the run-hook after the (insert chosen) rather > than before? That would mean that the hook had access to the full new > header. It would also mean that it wouldn't matter if the hook changed > the buffer -- as it is I think the replace might go wrong as we replace > beg to end and those seem to be integer-points not markers agreed. > > One final query -- this function will be called when completing any of > To: Cc: Bcc: From: and some other less common headers. We could pass an > argument which says which header we are on but that is probably more > complexity than necessary. However, it is probably worth documenting > that it may be called from these headers in the defcustom for the hook. > Just changing the doc sounds sensible to me. Adding extra arguments sounds complicated since we are also calling the hook from within the nothmuch-company backend. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
