Jani Nikula <j...@nikula.org> writes: > +/* Exit status code indicating that file(s) in the mail store were > + * removed or renamed after notmuch new scanned the directories but > + * before indexing the file(s). If the file was renamed, the indexing > + * might not be complete, and the user is advised to re-run notmuch > + * new. > + */ > +#define NOTMUCH_EXIT_VANISHED_FILES 10 > +
What do you think about defining something like NOTMUCH_EXIT_TEMPFAIL 75 (to match EX_TEMPFAIL) and using that? There is also some stalled patch around for insert to use EX_TEMPFAIL (although in that case part of the reason it has stalled is I'm not convinced the error is temporary). I think such an exit code would also make sense for locking failures; but that is a different discussion. Other than that the patch looks like an incremental improvement _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
