On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:53 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff at ocjtech.us> > wrote: >> I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I >> came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS. ?Once notmuch >> settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as >> an official package. ?If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I >> don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages. > > This sounds great, Jeffrey. > > What makes the most sense for this file? Shall we just leave it in the > central repository? Or put it in its own rpm branch? I'm open to your > suggestions here.
I don't think that a separate Git branch makes sense, but maybe stuff like this should be in a subdirectory like "packaging/fedora", since I imagine that there will eventually be a need for "packaging/debian" etc. as well. -- Jeff Ollie