On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:53 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff at ocjtech.us> 
> wrote:
>> I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I
>> came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS. ?Once notmuch
>> settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as
>> an official package. ?If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I
>> don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages.
> This sounds great, Jeffrey.
> What makes the most sense for this file? Shall we just leave it in the
> central repository? Or put it in its own rpm branch? I'm open to your
> suggestions here.

I don't think that a separate Git branch makes sense, but maybe stuff
like this should be in a subdirectory like "packaging/fedora", since I
imagine that there will eventually be a need for "packaging/debian"
etc. as well.

Jeff Ollie

Reply via email to