On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:05:06 +0100, Jed Brown <jed at 59A2.org> wrote: > First, I'm aware that such munging is A Bad Thing > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Definitely. > From: Some User <some.user at example.com> > To: Sample users list <sample-users at sample.org> > Reply-To: Sample users list <sample-users at sample.org> > > Notmuch reply produces > > To: Sample users list <sample-users at sample.org>, > Sample users list <sample-users at sample.org> > > Handling this is a bit messy, I think we want the current behavior > unless To matches Reply-To, in which case we use From and Reply-To. If > this is indeed the least bad behavior, I will make a patch for it. Oh, I really like that. The condition there avoids breaking legitimate uses of Reply-To, (such as the cairo lists I run, where cairo-commit@ has no user-generated From:---just a single automated address, but has Reply-To: set to the cairo@ list instead so that replies to committed patches go to the right place). -Carl -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20091128/fccc7aa2/attachment.pgp>
