On Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:39:50 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote: > But when viewing an actual message, I'm still planning on having notmuch > just return an arbitrary filename from the list of filenames associated > with that message. Does anyone see any problem with that? Can you think > of a case where you'd really care about seeing one or the other of > a particular duplicated message?
As long as it's deterministic. But if you don't display the first filename received, couldn't you exploit this by spoofing message ids? -- - Marten