On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote:
> But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate
> threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process
> and read messages. But manual operations like joining and splitting
> threads seem like the user just doing more work, and that *after* having
> read the messages. So that seems mostly backwards to me.

By the way, Outlook & Exchange suck (or at least some versions do), and
don't seem to generate In-Reply-To and References: headers. Just got a
mail which prompted me to write this mail. I'd really like to be able to
join messages in a case like this.

-- 
- Marten

Reply via email to