On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:25:18 +0100, Michal Sojka <sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz> wrote: > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:31:38 micah anderson wrote: > > The easiest way to answer this question is to try it. I did that, and > > things didn't work as expected. I expected that once the message was > > moved to a different folder, and 'notmuch new' was run, then the folder > > search result would move with the message move. > > I want it to work the same way as you expected. It seems it would be > necessary > to modify notmuch_database_remove_message() so that it changes folder term if > it detects rename.
Hey, Michal. I agree that this is a necessary improvement. It would also be nice if messages that don't currently have the field have it added, whether or not they're in the database to begin with. This is important for getting the field on messages that are already in the database. jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100202/2278f688/attachment.pgp>