also sprach martin f krafft <madduck at madduck.net> [2010.02.18.1500 +1300]: > > > If we keep ancestry though, we are reusing existing working code for > > > backup (git-pull :) > > > > This is one of the reasons I feel it's important we keep it. And as is > > stated below, the storage overhead is minimal. > > Absolutely; Stewart mentioned at LCA to forego the porcelain and > harness the power of the plumbing, and I knew back then that this > would be among the first things of which to convince him once he had > the basic idea out. ;)
Except I fear that as soon as we allow manipulation of the local store, we'll potentially run into this problem: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/001114.html id:20100112045152.GA15275 at lapse.rw.madduck.net -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ it's as bad as you think, and they are out to get you. spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100218/2414ba0d/attachment-0001.pgp>
