also sprach Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> [2010.02.24.2008 +0100]: > I agree that in its current form it's not useful, (it seems to be just a > long list of the patches that have ever been submitted). > > I seem to recall Martin saying that patches that get accepted will be > automatically detected and removed from the list. Is that successfully > happening now?
Yes, I've automatically tagged approx. 140 patches "accepted" so far. > In the meantime, if someone does want to push some buttons in > patchwork, nothing before 2009-12-01 at least is interesting. Okay, all of those can be tagged superseeded. -- martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ kermit: why are there so many songs about rainbows? fozzy: that's part of what rainbows do. spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100225/d1283b69/attachment.pgp>