On 2010-04-14, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote: > > The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread > > thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of > > older-first. > > Is this really what we want? If I sort messages by newest first, it > menas that I want to process my emails from the newest to the oldest. > I'm satisfied with the current behavour.
Agreed, I would be very surprised to get a different behavior.
