On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:26:43 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote: > A nice improvement, definitely. But I don't hear anyone actually wanting > a configuration value here. > > Would anyone complain if I just made these all visible by default? > > Would anyone complain if I removed the code to allow for th hiding of > the header?
Oh yeah that makes much more sense to me. I definitely don't want the headers hidden, so not having a config value for it certainly works for me. I just assumed that the header hiding was implemented because some people wanted it. If no one really wants to hide headers, then I would definitely vote for just removing all of that code and just displaying them. jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100423/4c64a3fe/attachment.pgp>