On 11 October 2010 15:01, Jameson Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras at > gmail.com> wrote: >> I think many people agree notmuch mainline has been rather slow. So >> I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or >> gitorious (please vote). >> >> More than one person should have write access to this repo, but some >> guidelines should be in place. I propose that patches should be >> signed-off-by at least another person in the mailing list before >> pushing. It would be nice if this is how the mainline branch works, >> but we don't need to wait for that to happen. We need to vote on who >> are the people to have write access. > > I think this generally sounds like a fine idea, but I don't see why we > need a single central repo that multiple people need access to. ?The > whole point of git is to allow for distributed development without need > for a central repo. > > In this case, folks can just merge the patches they're interested in > into a "next" branch in their own personal repos, publish them where > ever they want, and then every body can just keep their "next" branches > synced with each other. ?As consensus is reached, the next release will > emerge.
+1 and maintaining a list of these repos in the wiki ;) Servilio