On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian at sspaeth.de> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:11:47 +0100, Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chm.duquesne at > gmail.com> wrote: > > Very cool. Not wanting to promote my own things, but is there a reason > you use the notmuch binary and parse that output rather than using the > python bindings that come included with notmuch?
I was simply not aware of this binding... Reading your api, I could not find out if the queries were ran asynchronously. Is it possible? If so, that would indeed be worth giving it a try. Meanwhile, as a matter of personal taste, I must say I like more having processes communicating through pipes and raw text, unix-style, than using bindings. So I think I'll switch only if I get a significant reduction of the complexity of the code in exchange. Best regards, Christophe-Marie
