On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf <flo at chaoflow.net> wrote: > Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain > wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? > I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to > get a comparison of the two approaches.
Invoking notmuch the script and piping the results? I wouldn't call that python bindings anymore then. Also it is bound to be much more expensive than directly interfacing libnotmuch.so. > Na?vely, I imagine there is a header file and the generation of the > python bindings happens rather automagic. I wish it would be that easy. :-) Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110419/e25658c5/attachment.pgp>