Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal at jhu.edu> > wrote: > > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive > > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region > > without thinking about it, that this approach would make sense for the > > emacs interface. In other words, keep the emacs interface emacsy. I > > think I still agree with that, since I feel like having both would be > > confusing (what do you do when you select a marked-line in a region?) > > and I like the one I tend toward intuitively. But I certainly see the > > benefit of the other functionality as well. > > I should mention that in my experience it's usually not that hard to > construct searches (or filters on searches) that pair down to just the > messages you want to tag, in which case you can just tag the entire > buffer.
That's true. I always end up doing that way. Though, many Gnus users are used to mark and to massage all those messages at once, thus offering this possibility could help. /Xavier