On Mon, 16 May 2011 14:20:07 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth at cworth.org> wrote: > I'll have to learn better how to control the emacs mail composer in > order to understand how to get signatures to cover attachments if I want > to do that kind of thing.
See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire message, as opposed to just a single part. > This seems to be justifying my fears about the code duplication---the > two code paths are already divergent, (which means that things like > notmuch part-number identifiers cannot be used between the different > formats). I'd like to fix that by preventing the code duplication. > > Also, both paths seem to be suffering from some excess part-number > incrementing somewhere. I think the two paths reconverge later in the series. Can you look ahead a bit to see if that concern is addressed? jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110516/1cf51c2e/attachment.pgp>