On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:31:03 +0200, Sander Boer <sanderboer at mauc.nl> wrote: > If IMAP supports tags, is that not a big deal ? > I mean, having a converging point for all tags, is that not like the holy > grail in this field ?
One problem is that maildir doesn't support tags, so we would have to switch to a format that does or somehow store them in the maildir, in which case we would also have to adapt offlineimap or a similar tool to sync tags as well. > Do you know what the status is of *server* support ? Because imo this *is* a > big deal, without real standardized server support an IMAP store for tags is > off the table. Support for tags is mentioned in the RFC for IMAP, but it's optional. As far as I know, must servers today support them though. Cheers, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110706/1092631d/attachment.pgp>