On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:33:49 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki at schnouki.net> wrote: > Hello list, > > This is another rebased version of Pieter's series to add GPG and Emacs as > test > prereqs, plus some additions on my own. (Rebased and posted as requested by > Pieter [1].) > > Changes as compared to Pieter's patches (including parts from [2]): > - prereqs are not tested using test_expect_success as they were in Pieter's > original patches, but using a new function called test_set_bin_prereq. I > wrote > this before the gdb prereq was added, hence the different way to set it.
Hey, Thomas. Thanks so much for this work. This sounds like a better solution. However, in the patches you send I see a lot of changes of the form -test_expect_success 'emacs delivery of encrypted message with attachment' \ +test_expect_success GPG 'emacs delivery of encrypted message with attachment' \ and -test_expect_equal \ +test_expect_equal GPG \ which seems to contradict what you've said above. Not to mention that I don't see anything that modifies calls to the test_expect_ functions. Basically I see a lot more in the diffs than I would have expected in a cursory look. Is this just a rebase flub, or is there something I'm missing? jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111116/11f48b4d/attachment.pgp>
