On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:22:21 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:
> I've only been vaguely following this "test count" stuff, but I'm not > sure I understand what's the point of giving tests a number that is > ultimately mutable. Why not just label things by the test name, instead > of the count? That wouldn't require keeping track of number/name > mapping, which will change over time. We don't actually have test names, at least not ones directly suitable for file names. I guess we could encode them or something, is that what you mean? d
