On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:08:20 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009 at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> I think replying to an email which we sent and which does not have any
> other person on the to: line is sufficiently rare that it doesn't really
> matter what we do in this case.

I ended up fixing all of this properly. I'm hoping to send the patches
later today so you can have a look - the code will do a better job of
explaining itself than I'd do now. :)

BR,
Jani.

Reply via email to