On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 16:32, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote: > That's a good point. ?I think that maybe people are wanting to protect > against the accidental reply to all when you only mean to reply to the > sender.
Certainly a worthy cause. All I'm saying is I make the mistake in the other direction more frequently ;)
