On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:15:55 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:13:35 +0000, David Edmondson <dme at dme.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> > > wrote: > > > > [...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'? > > > > > > Nothing at all. I was fixing my own patch [1] without resorting to > > > requiring the `cl' package at runtime :) Would be nice if we could > > > get rid of the compile-time dependency as well, though. > > > > Can you explain why it's necessary at runtime? > > Because otherwise `remove-if-not' and `member-if-not' would > be void, as you alluded to previously [1,2].
Ah, not macros. Sorry for being slow. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120118/363500eb/attachment-0001.pgp>
