On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 16:13, Jani Nikula <jani at nikula.org> wrote: >> + ? ? (set-mark (point)) >> + ? ? (goto-char start) >> + ? ? ;; Quote the original message according to the user's configured style. >> + ? ? (message-cite-original) >> + ? ? (goto-char (point-max))))) >> + >> + ?(push-mark) >> ? ?(message-goto-body) >> - ?;; Original message may contain (malicious) MML tags. ?We must >> - ?;; properly quote them in the reply. ?Note that using `point-max' >> - ?;; instead of `mark' here is wrong. ?The buffer may include user's >> - ?;; signature which should not be MML-quoted. >> - ?(mml-quote-region (point) (mark))) > > Is it okay to drop mml quoting? Why?
As Austin pointed out on an earlier version, message-cite-original already does the quoting, so doing it ourselves will result in double-quoting MML tags.
