On Thu, Apr 05 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy at gmail.com> wrote: > +test_begin_subtest "Set string value" > +notmuch config set foo.bar baz > +test_expect_equal "$(notmuch config get foo.bar)" "baz" > + > +test_begin_subtest "Set list value" > +notmuch config set foo.list xxx "yyy yyy" "zzz zzz" > +test_expect_equal "$(notmuch config get foo.list)" "\ > +xxx > +yyy yyy > +zzz zzz"
I find it slightly strange to use non-existent fields here, but I also don't see that it hurts anything either. At least at the moment. Another option would be to use an existing field, and change it back when you're done. jamie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120410/296e2171/attachment.pgp>
