On Tue, Apr 17 2012, Justus Winter <4winter at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-04-13 10:33:58) >> Quoting Austin Clements (2012-04-01 04:23:23) >> >Maybe you could describe your use case in more detail? >> >> Quoting Austin Clements (2012-04-12 17:57:44) >> >Quoth Justus Winter on Apr 12 at 11:05 am: >> ... >> >I see. TL;DR >> >> .. which should pretty much settle Austins opinion on >> libnotmuch users being second class citizens. > > Na, I think you misinterpreted Austin here, I think he summarized his > position. Looking back at my mail I think I came across a lot harsher > than necessary, I'm sorry for that. Let's get back to the issue at > hand, shall we? > > Both Austin and Mark seem to support the split, any other opinions? I support it too (as did earlyer). Do we already have pushable series or is there a need for a new one ? It would be good to have this done so that application writers can start relying this being available in "official" notmuch (in 0.13 -- SONAME updated -- any other patches pending requiring SONAME bump to be reviewed ?). > > Cheers, > Justus Tomi
