Pieter Praet <pieter at praet.org> writes: > * emacs/notmuch-show.el > > (notmuch-show-get-messages-ids): > If provided with optional argument PREDICATE, only return > Message-Id's of messages for which PREDICATE returns non-nil. > > (notmuch-show-tag-all): > New argument ONLY-OPEN (set to `current-prefix-arg' if running > interactively): if non-nil, only change tags of *open* messages. > Also correct original docstring: 's/thread/buffer/'. > > (notmuch-show-archive-thread): > Update wrt changes to `notmuch-show-tag-all'. > > * test/emacs > > - Subtest "notmuch-show: change tags of open messages in current buffer" > is no longer broken...
This patch is stale, but in case it helps.. > --- > emacs/notmuch-show.el | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > test/emacs | 1 - > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el > index 05606fc..4bd1a7c 100644 > --- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el > +++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el > @@ -1339,14 +1339,18 @@ (defun notmuch-show-get-message-id () > "Return the message id of the current message." > (concat "id:\"" (notmuch-show-get-prop :id) "\"")) > > -(defun notmuch-show-get-messages-ids (&optional separator) > +(defun notmuch-show-get-messages-ids (&optional separator predicate) > "Return a list of Message-Id's of all messages in the current buffer. > > If provided with optional argument SEPARATOR, return a string > -instead, consisting of all Message-Id's separated by SEPARATOR." > +instead, consisting of all Message-Id's separated by SEPARATOR. > + > +If provided with optional argument PREDICATE, only return > +Message-Id's of messages for which PREDICATE returns non-nil." > (let ((message-ids)) > (notmuch-show-mapc > - (lambda () (push (notmuch-show-get-message-id) message-ids))) > + (lambda () (push (notmuch-show-get-message-id) message-ids)) > + predicate) > (if separator > (mapconcat 'identity message-ids separator) > message-ids))) > @@ -1633,18 +1637,29 @@ (defun notmuch-show-tag (&optional initial-input) > initial-input (notmuch-show-get-message-id)))) > (apply 'notmuch-show-tag-message tag-changes))) > > -(defun notmuch-show-tag-all (&rest tag-changes) > - "Change tags for all messages in the current thread. > +(defun notmuch-show-tag-all (only-open &rest tag-changes) > + "Change tags of all messages in the current buffer. I'm not crazy about notmuch-show-tag-all having an argument to control whether or not it tags all. Introduce another function, or perhaps change this one's name? I also don't really like that the only-open argument comes before the tag changes. This means changing every caller (although I guess there's just one right now). I think tag-changes are more important and should come first. (tag-changes are &optional instead of &rest in master, so you can just put only-open after instead of before.) > + > +If ONLY-OPEN is non-nil, only change tags of *open* messages in > +the current buffer. > > TAG-CHANGES is a list of tag operations for `notmuch-tag'." > - (interactive (notmuch-read-tag-changes nil notmuch-show-thread-id)) > - (apply 'notmuch-tag (notmuch-show-get-messages-ids " or ") tag-changes) > + (interactive (cons current-prefix-arg > + (notmuch-read-tag-changes nil notmuch-show-thread-id))) > + (apply 'notmuch-tag > + (notmuch-show-get-messages-ids > + " or " > + `(lambda () > + ,(if only-open '(notmuch-show-message-visible-p) t))) > + tag-changes) This is a very awkward use of backquote, to my eyes. Besides, can't you just replace this with (if only-open 'notmuch-show-message-visible-p nil) ? > (notmuch-show-mapc > (lambda () > (let* ((current-tags (notmuch-show-get-tags)) > (new-tags (notmuch-update-tags current-tags tag-changes))) > (unless (equal current-tags new-tags) > - (notmuch-show-set-tags new-tags)))))) > + (notmuch-show-set-tags new-tags)))) > + `(lambda () > + ,(if only-open '(notmuch-show-message-visible-p) t)))) Same. Ethan
