-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 28/11/12 19:39, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, David Bremner wrote:
>> Right. But without that, the whole thing could be scripted pretty easily I 
>> think, just parse
>> the x-labels header and use notmuch-deliver or something like that.
> 
> You're saying to get offlineimap to add the x-labels header and than have 
> another simple tool
> which parses that header from the messages, rather than adding code to 
> notmuch?  Sounds
> sensible to me.
> 
> There were same patches regarding batch tagging so those could be used nicely 
> for that
> approach.
> 
True - and nice for archiving emails. But I think the sync would be 
tremendiously useful. And as
in another email noted by Jeremy Nickurak, gmail and notmuch are a perfect 
match as they both
operate on labels / tags, and not on folders. This is in contrast to mu, for 
which the gmail
labels are just another search term and not differentiated from any other terms.

Cheers,

Rainer



> 
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlC3JbAACgkQoYgNqgF2egqLfQCfY75jMOk2VZZ7/1Qzfjt0+xPs
L5QAn0nhmuJ8ta1tlNYvxR+KHwp2szvb
=uLII
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to