Charles Celerier <cceleri at cs.stanford.edu> writes: > An underscore should precede every function name in > lib/notmuch-private.h.
Is this a reference to notmuch coding style document, or something else? > This was not true and was noted by the failure of test > T360-symbol-hiding on Mac OS/X. This patch inserts an underscore > before each function name in lib/notmuch-private.h where the > underscore was missing and renames functions appropriately where they > are used. I'm not sure I understand the problem this patch is intended to solve. Is the problem that symbols are being inadvertantly exported? Or the test is wrong? d
