David Bremner wrote: > X?c? <xico at atelo.org> writes: > > As a side note, is there any rationale for the hand-made configure? Not > > that I am a big fan of autoconf/cmake/whatever either... > > Carl Worth had a lot of (negative) experience with autoconf when he > started the project, which motivated him to roll his own. Personally I > don't really think any of the alternatives are convincingly better than > autoconf. Of course it's one of those very subjective things.
I think Makefiles are superior to autoconf. What we have is fine. -- Felipe Contreras