On Fri, 03 Oct 2014, Austin Clements <aclements at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > Previously, this was implemented using a horrible GDB script (because > there is no such thing as a non-horrible GDB script). This GDB script > often broke with newer versions of GDB for mysterious reasons. Port > the test script to GDB's Python API, which makes the code much cleaner > and, hopefully, more stable. > --- > > Hi Amadeusz. Does this patch fix the problem for you? I don't have > GDB 7.8, so I can't test against it, but the Python interface is less > fragile than the GDB scripting language. (Even if this doesn't fix > your problem, I think we should switch to the Python interface.)
Oops. I meant this to be a reply to id:87sijovhuf.fsf at freja.aidecoe.name. Sorry for any confusion.