On Thu, Jan 15 2015, David Bremner <david at tethera.net> wrote: > It seems no very recent system has gmime2.4. I guess several of these > gmime2.4 only code paths are both security critical (e.g. in crypto.c) > and mostly untested. > > Is there good reason to keep supporting gmime 2.4?
if there are potential security issues that we do not test (i.e. I do not test), then removing (instead of just deprecating) is a good option -- I'll just have to install gmime-2.6 on my Scientific Linux 6.2 system... Tomi > > d