On Thu 2015-01-15 05:20:47 -0500, David Bremner wrote: > It seems no very recent system has gmime2.4. I guess several of these > gmime2.4 only code paths are both security critical (e.g. in crypto.c) > and mostly untested. > > Is there good reason to keep supporting gmime 2.4?
gmime 2.6 is available in squeeze-backports, which is about as old as anyone can reasonably expect to run an end-user system these days in my book. I have no objection to dropping gmime 2.4 support. --dkg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 948 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20150115/62b8265f/attachment.pgp>