Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <[email protected]> writes: > Besides the previous date-based result orderings (oldest-first and > newest-first) add two more filesize-based orderings: biggest-first > smallest-first. > > The orderings are interchangeable, you can specify any one as the > default via notmuch-search-default-sort-order or as the preffered spelling ^ > ordering for a saved search (via the :sort-order property). > > Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <[email protected]> > --- > emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 9 ++++++--- > emacs/notmuch-lib.el | 4 +++- > emacs/notmuch.el | 12 ++++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el > index 3ba2a16b..51117577 100644 > --- a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el > +++ b/emacs/notmuch-hello.el > @@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ searches so they still work in customize." > (choice :tag " Sort Order" > (const :tag "Default" nil) > (const :tag "Oldest-first" oldest-first) > - (const :tag "Newest-first" newest-first))) > + (const :tag "Newest-first" newest-first) > + (const :tag "Biggest-first" biggest-first) > + (const :tag "Smallest-first" > smallest-first)))
I agree with Tomi that Largest sounds better than Biggest here. _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
