Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
> +
> + if (params->crypto.decrypt == NOTMUCH_DECRYPT_TRUE &&
> session_key_count_error == NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
> + unsigned int new_session_keys = 0;
> + if (notmuch_message_count_properties (message, "session-key",
> &new_session_keys) == NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS &&
> + new_session_keys > session_keys) {
> + /* try a quiet re-indexing */
> + notmuch_indexopts_t *indexopts =
> notmuch_database_get_default_indexopts (notmuch_message_get_database
> (message));
> + if (indexopts) {
> + notmuch_indexopts_set_decrypt_policy (indexopts,
> NOTMUCH_DECRYPT_AUTO);
> + status = notmuch_message_reindex (message, indexopts);
> + if (status)
> + fprintf (stderr, "Error re-indexing message with
> --decrypt=stash. (%d) %s\n", status, notmuch_status_to_string (status));
> + }
> + }
> + }
I'm wondering about the lack of #if HAVE_GMIME_SESSION_KEYS here. Are
you relying here on the number of session keys not increasing when
running a binary without session key support? Is there some advantage to
doing it this way? It seems a bit harder to reason about.
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
