On Wed, Jun 13 2018, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > On Wed 2018-06-13 13:25:54 -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> What about using symbols and some kind of case? less efficient but >> better error checking > > symbols would also make for a more brittle interaction between future > versions of the notmuch cli and notmuch-emacs, but i agree that the > error checking would probably be worth it (it's not hard to update the > list of symbols if a new option gets added to "show --decrypt". > > also, it looks like notmuch-mua-reply reasons about > notmuch-show-process-crypto to create the --decrypt= arg for "notmuch > reply". "notmuch reply" doesn't have --decrypt=stash (and i don't think > there's any sensible workflow that would warrant puting it there) so > some reasoning needs to be done there. symbols would make that a more > sensible approach.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "symbols", but I'm working on something that will turn notmuch-crypto-process-mime into a choice custom with constant values. A separate derived value will be used to provide the correct bool to notmuch-show-process-crypto. I'll provide another iteration that we can discuss. jamie.
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list email@example.com https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch