On Sun 2018-06-24 22:15:46 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> writes:
>
>> @@ -270,7 +274,7 @@ _notmuch_message_crypto_potential_payload 
>> (_notmuch_message_crypto_t *msg_crypto
>>      if (parent && GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED (parent) && childnum == 
>> GMIME_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED_VERSION) {
>>      const char *enc_type = g_mime_object_get_content_type_parameter 
>> (parent, "protocol");
>>      GMimeContentType *ct = g_mime_object_get_content_type (payload);
>> -    if (ct) {
>> +    if (ct && enc_type) {
>>          const char *part_type = g_mime_content_type_get_mime_type (ct);
>>          if (part_type && strcmp (part_type, enc_type) == 0)
>>              return NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS;
>
> I couldn't really understand why enc_type was defined earlier than it
> was used here. Is this a bug fix?

whoops, you're right.  I've moved this particular edit to an earlier
patch in the series.  good catch, thanks!

      --dkg
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Reply via email to