Hi David, * David Bremner <[email protected]> [2018-07-31; 06:45]: > This series obsoletes the patch (series) > > id:[email protected] > id:[email protected] > id:[email protected] > > It also includes a proposed fix for the problem reported by Gregor in > > id:[email protected]
I applied the patch set and it solves the problem for the first thread shown in id:[email protected] For me this fixes the more important issue of the two. It does not fix the ordering in the second example: [support.xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx.de #33575] AutoReply: FYI: xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxx 1 via RT <[email protected]> (Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:44:24 +0200) (inbox) --> Subject: [support.xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx.de #33575] Resolved: FYI: xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxx 2 Gregor Zattler <[email protected]> (Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:26:26 +0200) (inbox) Subject: FYI: xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxx 2a via RT <[email protected]> (Tue, 19 Jun 2018 18:26:36 +0200) (inbox) Subject: [support.xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx.de #33575] AutoReply: FYI: xxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxx xxx I have to admit, this is not one thread if one accounts for threads only with respect to References -headers. But even if it's two threads we have two level 1 emails (1, 2) and I would expect the level 1 emails to be sorted according to date, the whole tree of sibling emails to every level 1 email behind and indented relative to it's level 1 email: 2 2a 1 This is, what mutt does. Thanks for your efforts, it's much easier now to follow email discussions. Ciao; Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.- _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
